Deuteronomy 20:19 When thou shalt besiege a city a long time, in making war against it to take it, thou shalt not destroy the trees thereof by forcing an axe against them: for thou mayest eat of them, and thou shalt not cut them down (for the tree of the field is man's life ) to employ them in the siege: The trees thereof,
to wit, the fruit trees, as appears from the following words; which is to be understood of a general destruction of them, not of the cutting down of some few of them, as the conveniency of the siege might require.
Man’s life,
i.e. the sustenance or support of his life, as
life
is taken
Deu 24:6. But this place may be otherwise translated, as it is in the margin of our English Bibles:
For, O man, (the Hebrew letter
he
being here the note of a vocative case, as it is
Psalm 9:7)
the tree
(or trees, the singular number for the plural, as is common) of the field is (or ought, as the Hebrew
lamed
is used
Esther 9:1 Psalm 62:10)
to be employed in the siege; or, as it is in the Hebrew,
to go before thy face, i.e. to make fences for thy security,
in the siege.
The trees of the field:
I here understand not its general signification of all trees, including fruit-bearing trees, as that phrase is commonly used, but in its more special and distinct signification, for unfruitful trees, as it is taken
Isaiah 55:12; or such as grow only in open fields, such as are elsewhere called the
trees of the wood,
1 Chronicles 16:33 Isaiah 7:2, or
the trees of the forest,
Song of Solomon 2:3 Isaiah 10:19, which are opposed to the trees of the gardens,
Genesis 3:2 ,8 Ec 2:5 Ezekiel 31:9; as the
flower of the field,
Psalm 103:15 Isaiah 40:6, and
the lilies of the field,
Matthew 6:28, are opposed to those that grow in gardens, and are preserved and cultivated by the gardener’s art and care. And so it is a very proper argument to dissuade from the destroying of fruit trees, because the wild and unfruitful trees were sufficient for the use of the siege. And this sense fitly agrees with the following words, where the concession or grant, which here is delivered in more ambiguous terms, of
the tree of the field, is repeated and explained concerning
the trees which thou knowest that they be not trees for meat.